.svg)
Your startup is off the ground, and you're building a talented team to help take it to the next level. Offering equity is a great way to attract top talent and ensure everyone is invested in the company's success.
But when it comes to dividing equity, things can get complicated quickly. Equity division isn't always straightforward. Like many aspects of building a business, it requires thoughtful planning and understanding.
You've already overcome countless hurdles in your entrepreneurial journey- figuring out how to distribute equity is the next step.
In this guide, we'll break down what equity in a startup means, explore the different types, and walk you through strategies for dividing equity in a startup.
What is Equity in a Startup?
Equity represents ownership in a company. It refers to the shares or stock that founders, employees, investors, and other stakeholders hold, signifying their proportionate stake in the company.
Since startups begin with little to no cash reserves, equity is often used as compensation or incentive, especially for early-stage employees, co-founders, and investors who take on significant risks in the company's formative years.
Equity not only represents ownership but also a claim to future profits and decision-making influence within the company. As the startup grows and becomes more valuable, the equity stakeholders hold can increase in value, thereby offering potentially lucrative returns if the company is successful.
Types of Equity in Startups
The type of equity startup issues can vary, depending on the stage of the startup and the nature of the relationship with the recipient. Here are the most common types of equity in startups:
Common Stock
Founders and early-stage employees are usually given common stock, which gives them voting rights on major company decisions, such as electing the board of directors or approving major acquisitions.
Common stockholders are last in line for claims on company assets if the company is liquidated, after creditors and preferred stockholders.
Preferred Stock
Preferred stockholders have a higher claim on the company's assets and earnings than common stockholders. They often receive dividends before common shareholders and have priority in the event of a liquidation.
Investors, especially venture capitalists, receive preferred stock as it offers more protections, such as anti-dilution provisions and liquidation preferences, which make it a more attractive option for them.
Stock Options
Stock options give employees the right to purchase company shares at a predetermined price (the strike price) after a certain period, usually following a vesting schedule.
This type of equity is commonly used as part of compensation packages to incentivize employees, as they stand to gain financially if the company’s stock price increases significantly.
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)
Restricted stock units are company shares promised to employees, typically subject to vesting criteria. Unlike stock options, RSUs don't require employees to purchase shares; they receive the shares outright after meeting specific conditions, such as staying with the company for a set period.
RSUs can be a less risky form of equity for employees since no financial investment is required upfront.
Warrants
Warrants are similar to stock options, but they are usually issued to investors, rather than employees, as a sweetener in investment deals. They give the holder the right to buy shares at a fixed price within a certain time frame.
Warrants can be an attractive incentive for investors, as they offer the potential for future gains if the company's value rises.
Convertible Notes and SAFEs
Convertible notes and Simple Agreements for Future Equity (SAFEs) are forms of convertible securities. They are often used in early-stage funding rounds when it is difficult to accurately value the startup.
Convertible notes are debt instruments that convert into equity at a later date, usually when the startup raises a priced funding round. SAFEs, on the other hand, are simpler agreements that convert to equity in future rounds but are not structured as debt, meaning they don’t accrue interest or require repayment.
These instruments allow startups to raise funds quickly without the complexities of immediate equity issuance.
Why Does Equity Division Matter in a Startup?
Equity division lays the foundation for long-term relationships, influences the startup's culture, and impacts the operational and financial success of the business.
Here's why equity division matters:
Aligns Incentives
Proper equity division ensures team members are motivated to contribute to the company's success. By giving key contributors a stake in the business, equity aligns their financial incentives with the company's long-term growth.
When employees and co-founders share ownership, they are more likely to be committed to the company's vision, invest their time and energy into its success, and make decisions that benefit the company.
Encourages Long-Term Commitment
Startups face a great deal of uncertainty, and building a successful company often requires years of hard work. Equity is a powerful retention tool, incentivizing team members to stay with the company for the long haul.
Vesting schedules, which require equity to be earned over time, further strengthen this commitment by ensuring that individuals are rewarded for their continued contributions.
Attracts Talent and Investors
In the early stages, startups often have limited cash to offer competitive salaries, making equity a vital tool for attracting top talent.
Potential employees may be willing to accept lower salaries in exchange for equity, seeing it as an opportunity for greater financial gain if the company succeeds.
Similarly, investors view how the equity is divided as a reflection of how the company values its team and manages its resources. A well-structured equity distribution can make the startup more appealing to venture capitalists and angel investors.
Prevents Future Conflicts
How equity is divided can either strengthen the bond between co-founders or become a source of tension. Disagreements over equity are one of the leading causes of co-founder disputes, which can cripple a startup's chances of success.
Clearly defining how and why equity is divided helps prevent misunderstandings and ensures everyone is on the same page. It also provides a framework for resolving any future disagreements over ownership stakes.
Approaches to Dividing Equity
Equal Split vs. Unequal Split
A significant decision founders face when dividing equity in a startup is whether to choose an equal or unequal split. This decision can shape the company's culture, impact team dynamics, and influence long-term success.
Equal Split
An equal equity split means dividing ownership equally among all co-founders, regardless of their roles, responsibilities, or contributions. This approach is ideal when founders want to promote fairness and unity, especially in the early stages when all co-founders are taking on significant risks.
Pros
- An equal division can foster a sense of shared ownership and responsibility, reducing potential feelings of inequality among co-founders.
- By avoiding debates over who deserves more equity, founders can focus on building the business rather than negotiating percentages.
- An equal split reduces the potential for tension in the founding team, especially when individual contributions might be hard to quantify early on.
Cons
- Not all co-founders contribute equally in terms of time, expertise, or resources. An equal split can fail to recognize these differences, leading to frustration over time.
- Over time, founders who feel they've contributed more may grow resentful of those with equal ownership but less involvement, which can strain relationships.
Unequal Split
An unequal equity split allocates ownership based on each founder's contributions, responsibilities, and expected long-term involvement. This method is more tailored and reflects the value each person brings to the startup.
Pros
- By rewarding co-founders based on their input and risk level, an unequal split ensures that each person's equity stake mirrors their impact on the business.
- With roles and contributions acknowledged through an unequal split, there’s less risk of disputes later, especially if one founder is significantly more involved.
- If a founder brings specialized skills or substantial investment to the table, offering a larger share of equity can serve as a powerful incentive.
Cons
- Deciding on the percentage of ownership for each founder can be time-consuming and may lead to difficult discussions.
- Founders receiving a smaller share may feel undervalued, potentially leading to decreased motivation or early exits.
Deciding between an equal and unequal split depends on the team's dynamic, contributions, and long-term goals. In many cases, the best solution is to have open and transparent discussions about expectations and contributions before finalizing the equity division.
This ensures each founder feels valued and that the ownership structure supports the startup's success.
The Dynamic Equity Split
The dynamic equity split is designed to account for the contributions and responsibilities of team members over time.
Unlike traditional methods, where equity is allocated based on upfront assumptions, a dynamic split adjusts equity according to each founder's or team member's actual input, whether that be financial investment, time commitment, expertise, or other contributions.
In a startup's early stages, it's difficult to predict who will contribute the most in terms of effort, skills, or resources. As the company grows, team members may take on new roles, and their responsibilities might shift.
The dynamic equity model allows for continuous evaluation and realignment of equity distribution, ensuring that contributions are rewarded fairly.
How It Works
A dynamic equity split usually involves periodic reassessments of each team member's contributions. These evaluations consider various factors, such as:
- Work hours: The time each founder or employee devotes to the business.
- Financial contributions: Initial and ongoing investments made by team members.
- Value of expertise: The market value of specific skills and knowledge brought to the table.
- Risk taken: The level of personal risk (financial or otherwise) that each member assumes.
Each factor is assigned a certain weight, and based on these ongoing contributions, the equity percentages are adjusted accordingly. This prevents any discrepancies between contributions and rewards, ensuring a fairer division of ownership over time.
Vesting Schedules and Cliff
When dividing equity among founders and employees in a startup, implement vesting schedules to ensure commitment and incentivize long-term contributions to the company.
A vesting schedule outlines how and when equity is earned over time, preventing any individual from gaining full ownership of their shares too early in the startup's journey.
Vesting Schedules
Vesting schedules are structured over four years, where equity is granted incrementally.
For example, if a founder is allocated 40% of the total equity, they might earn 1/48 of that equity each month over four years. This gradual earning process ensures that individuals remain engaged and contribute to the startup’s growth.
Vesting schedules can be tailored to suit the specific needs of the startup, with different timelines and percentages depending on roles and expectations. For instance, a co-founder who plays an important role in product development may have a more favorable vesting schedule than an advisor with a less hands-on role.
Cliff Periods
A "cliff" is an initial period during which no equity is vested. The typical duration for a cliff is one year. This means that if a founder or employee leaves the company before the cliff period ends, they forfeit their right to any equity.
Once the cliff period concludes, the individual receives a lump sum of equity that corresponds to the vesting schedule.
For example, if a founder's vesting schedule includes a one-year cliff and a four-year total vesting period, they would not receive any equity for the first year. After completing the year, they would then receive 25% of their total equity (the portion that corresponds to the year completed) and continue to earn the remaining equity monthly thereafter.
Startup Equity Division Example
To illustrate equity division in a startup, let’s consider a hypothetical scenario involving three co-founders: Alice, Bob, and Clara. Each founder brings unique skills and resources to the table, and their contributions significantly impact the startup's potential for success.
Startup Model: A tech platform that connects freelancers with businesses in need of their services.
Founders' Contributions
Alice:
- Role: CEO
- Contribution: Developed the initial business plan, secured initial funding of $100,000, and has previous experience running a successful startup.
- Proposed Equity: 50%
Bob:
- Role: CTO
- Contribution: Designed the platform architecture and will lead the tech development team. He has a strong background in software engineering and brings valuable technical expertise.
- Proposed Equity: 30%
Clara:
- Role: CMO
- Contribution: Crafted the marketing strategy and has a wide network in the freelance community, which will help in user acquisition. She also handles investor relations and business development.
- Proposed Equity: 20%
Equity Split Breakdown
Initially, Alice proposes an equal split, where each founder receives one-third (33.33%) of the equity. However, during discussions, it becomes clear that their contributions and roles differ significantly. Therefore, they agree on an unequal split based on their proposed percentages:
- Alice: 50%
- Bob: 30%
- Clara: 20%
Vesting Schedule
To protect the startup’s interests, the founders implement a four-year vesting schedule with a one-year cliff. This means that the equity will only fully vest after four years, and the founders must remain actively involved in the startup for at least one year to start earning their equity.
Here’s the breakdown:
- Year 1: After one year, 25% of each founder's equity vests.
- Years 2-4: The remaining equity vests monthly over the next three years.
Future Considerations
As the startup grows, they may consider adding new team members or advisors. In this case, they must allocate equity wisely, considering potential dilution for existing founders.
The founders decide to keep 10% of the total equity reserved for future hires and advisors, ensuring they can attract top talent without drastically reducing their ownership stakes.
Factors to Consider When Dividing Startup Equity
Dividing equity among founders and early team members can impact the startup’s future success and culture. Here are factors to consider when determining how to allocate equity:
Roles and Responsibilities
Different contributions—be they in leadership, product development, marketing, or sales—should be reflected in the equity split. Founders who take on more important roles or provide essential skills that drive the company forward may warrant a larger equity share.
Clearly defining each member's responsibilities can help ensure a fair distribution that aligns with contributions.
Risk and Investment
Founders who invest more capital or resources should receive a corresponding equity share, reflecting their financial risk. Similarly, consider non-monetary risks taken, such as leaving a secure job or investing personal time and effort into the startup.
Stage of Involvement
The stage at which each founder joins the startup can influence equity distribution. Founders involved in the initial stages—developing the business idea, conducting market research, or building a prototype—may deserve a larger share compared to those who join later.
Market Value of Skills
Each founder's unique skills and expertise contribute to the startup's potential for success. Evaluate the market value of these skills and how they complement the overall team.
For instance, a co-founder with extensive industry experience or technical skills that are in high demand may warrant a more significant equity stake. Assessing the relative value of each founder's skills ensures that equity is distributed in a way that reflects their contributions to the startup’s mission.
Long-Term Vision
Founders who are deeply committed to the startup's goals and share a unified vision should be rewarded accordingly. This ensures all founders are motivated to work towards common objectives.
Common Mistakes of Equity Distribution
When it comes to distributing equity in a startup, founders often make errors that can lead to long-term complications and conflicts. Understanding these mistakes can help you divide equity more effectively.
Ignoring Future Contributions
Founders might be tempted to allocate equity based solely on initial roles or past contributions, overlooking the importance of ongoing effort and commitment. Equity should reflect not only the work that has already been done but also the anticipated future value each member will bring to the company.
Establishing vesting schedules can help mitigate this issue by tying equity to continued involvement and performance.
Failing to Document Agreements
Oral agreements can lead to misunderstandings and disputes down the line. Have clear, written contracts that outline the terms of equity distribution, including the percentage each founder receives and any conditions attached.
This documentation provides a reference point that can help prevent conflicts and ensure everyone is on the same page regarding expectations.
Not Accounting for Dilution
Founders often underestimate the impact of dilution on their equity stakes. When new investors come on board or additional shares are issued, existing shareholders’ percentages can be significantly reduced.
Consider how future funding rounds will affect equity distribution and communicate this risk to all stakeholders involved. Founders should plan for dilution and possibly reserve additional equity for future hires or investors to avoid potential disputes later.
Overlooking Exit Strategy
Founders should discuss how their equity allocations will align with potential exits, such as acquisitions or public offerings. Understanding how equity will be valued and distributed in these scenarios can influence how much equity is allocated initially.
Failing to consider exit strategies can lead to disagreements among founders and investors, especially if expectations around equity value differ.
When Should Founders Divide Equity?
Timing plays a significant role in ensuring a fair and strategic equity distribution. Here are moments when founders should consider dividing equity:
Formation of the Startup
Ideally, equity should be discussed and allocated during the initial formation of the startup. At this stage, founders should have a clear understanding of their roles, contributions, and the overall vision for the business.
After Defining Roles and Responsibilities
Once the roles and responsibilities of each founder are clearly defined, it's time to address equity distribution. Understanding who is responsible for what can guide equitable division. This ensures each founder’s contributions are recognized appropriately.
At Milestones
Significant milestones, like securing funding, completing a product prototype, or reaching a certain revenue threshold, are ideal times to revisit equity discussions.
Upon New Founders Joining
If new founders or key team members are brought on board, equity distribution should be addressed. This involves not only allocating equity to new members but also evaluating the impact on existing founders' shares to maintain fairness and motivation.
Before Major Investments or Funding Rounds
Clarify equity distribution as your startup prepares for funding rounds. Investors will want to understand the equity structure and the ownership stakes of each founder. Having a well-defined equity arrangement can enhance investor confidence and streamline negotiations.
When Considering an Exit Strategy
Before contemplating any exit strategy, such as selling the company or going public, founders should ensure that equity is appropriately divided. This can help prevent disputes that may arise during negotiations with potential buyers or during an IPO.
Regularly Throughout the Startup’s Lifecycle
Equity division is not a one-time event. Regular check-ins on equity distribution, especially after significant business changes or founder contributions, help ensure that the equity structure remains aligned with the evolving dynamics of the startup.
Wrapping Up
Dividing equity in a startup can significantly impact the success of the business. Understand the different types of equity and the various approaches to equity division to make the right choices that reflect your startup's unique circumstances and the contributions of each team member.
As startups grow, so too should the equity arrangements to ensure they remain fair and aligned with the contributions of all parties involved. By considering factors like roles, responsibilities, risk, and long-term vision, founders can craft equitable solutions that foster collaboration and motivation.
FAQs
Who gets equity in a startup?
Equity in a startup is distributed among founders, investors, employees, and advisors.
How is equity distributed in a startup?
Equity distribution in a startup is determined through a process called capitalization. This involves dividing the company ownership into shares, which are then allocated to different individuals or entities.
Here are some common ways equity is distributed:
- Founders' shares
- Investor shares
- Employee stock options
- Advisor or consultant equity
How do you calculate startup equity?
Calculating startup equity involves these steps:
- Determine the total number of ownership units in the company.
- Allocate shares to founders, investors, and employees.
- Divide the number of shares each individual or entity holds by the total number of shares to determine their ownership percentage.
